Multimedia

Chicago Auto Show Blog

Who shares the burden?

Posted by: Mark Bilek

A few months ago, when gas was $4.00+ per gallon, everyone was clamoring for more fuel-efficient vehicles. Buyers flocked to small cars, environmentalists insisted on strict fuel-economy regulations, and the government knee-jerked into action like it always does, with the meandering ferocity of a three-toed sloth.

Now that gas prices have dropped to 2005-levels, public outcry for fuel efficiency has faded and the automakers, many of whom scrambled to redefine model lineups with more efficient cars and SUVs, are left to bear the brunt of buyer's fickle preferences.

However, in the mad dash to be the first to offer the 100-mpg car, automakers learned something: fuel efficiency has a price. A recent "Automotive News" article, pegged the tab of improving the fuel economy of today's vehicles by 25-30% at almost $1000. That's the cost of adding features like a 6-speed transmission, electric power steering, stop-start, and direct injection.

Now, I'm no math wiz (heck, that's why I went into Journalism in the first place) but let's assume that $1000 made a 30-mpg sedan 25% more efficient and increased fuel economy to 37.5 mpg. Annual gas savings would be around 67 gallons per year. That's not bad.

However, at that savings rate, it would take owners more than five years to recoup their additional purchase price in fuel savings. Let me repeat that for the hard of hearing, FIVE YEARS. (BTW, the cost of financing an additional $1000 over five years adds an additional $20 to your monthly payment.)

There's no doubt that we MUST do everything possible to increase the fuel efficiency of today's vehicles and reduce our dependency of foreign oil. But, perhaps we shouldn't put 100% of the onus on the automakers. After all, they are in business to make money and do provide jobs to more than 1 million Americans.

Maybe some of that burden should fall on the consumer. If the automakers have to invest $25 billion into improving fuel efficiency, shouldn't the consumer at least have to make a smarter purchase? Shouldn't we penalize buyers who choose a thirsty V8 over a thrifty V6? Maybe we should tax the bejesus out of people who buy a vehicle that's the wrong size for the job?

I'll leave you with this thought. The Nissan Pathfinder and Nissan Altima have roughly the same passenger and covered cargo space. Yet the Altima is as much as 40% more fuel efficient. If people simply made the smart and environmentally friendly decision by purchasing an Altima over a Pathfinder, we'd achieve significant fuel savings at NO additional cost.

It might sound simple, but if everyone really cares about curbing our oil addition and saving the planet, doesn't this make more sense in the short term? 

« Last Post Next Post »

View all Posts from this Blog

Follow Us Socially Using #CAS16

Blog

More

Wednesday, April, 20, 2016

April is Distracted Driving Awareness Month

Honda is encouraging safer driving habits with a social media campaign titled #PhoneDownEyesUp. The campaign ...

Wednesday, April, 13, 2016

Ford Now Accepting Applications for GT Supercar

For the first time, 2015 Chicago Auto Show goers were able to see the Ford GT supercar in person at the show and ...

Wednesday, March, 30, 2016

Cars are the Star of the Big Apple

Automakers lit up the Big Apple last week with an assortment of flashy vehicles that debuted during the New York ...

Monday, March, 14, 2016

Buick Presents Cascada to Midwest Automotive Media Association

Buick Vice President of Marketing Tony DiSalle spotlighted the all-new Buick Cascada during the Midwest Automotive ...

Monday, February, 29, 2016

Chevy Inspires Kindness in #DayItForward

Today is a unique day in history, one that does not come around often but has inspired goodness throughout ...

Friday, February, 19, 2016

Test Tracks Are A Gear Shifter

Of everything to see and do at the Chicago Auto Show, some of the most popular attractions are the test tracks, ...

Wednesday, February, 17, 2016

Women's Day Revs Up Excellence

Women's Day at the Chicago Auto Show is a revolutionary way to bring a diverse group of women with a common ...

Monday, February, 15, 2016

Nonstop Action at Family Fun Day

Presidents Day at the auto show featured an enthusiastic selection of family fun and appealed to all family ...

Saturday, February, 13, 2016

Acura Showcases New Concept Vehicle

As a wood panel walkway spins to unveil a luxury car, you know you are about to witness something truly ...

Saturday, February, 13, 2016

The new 2017 Genesis Vision G hits the floors of the Chicago Auto Show

Luxury is all about satisfying the senses. From cars to homes, leather seats to killer sound systems, these are ...

More

4/29/2016 8:33:00 AM

Look how far Jeep has come since the '61 Chicago Auto Show! #FlashbackFriday

4/28/2016 1:21:25 PM

How many LEGO pieces does it take to build this Porsche 911 GT3 RS? http://cnet.co/1qYJwJU

4/26/2016 10:07:28 AM

The Chicago Auto Show Changed their cover photo.

4/22/2016 11:41:35 AM

#FlashbackFriday to the 1967 Chicago Auto Show! #Globe #EarthDay

4/19/2016 9:31:03 AM

#TriviaTuesday! In the 60s, Ford Motor Company's robot's name was Freddie. Can you name Ford's current robot (that was at #CAS16

4/18/2016 9:48:40 AM

Scion may be on the way out, but the solid iM is here to stay." Head over to DriveChicago for the full review

4/15/2016 9:03:00 AM

The 2017 Ram Trucks Power Wagon that took center stage at #CAS16 is expected out this fall: http://bit.ly/RAMPowerWagonCAS #RAM #PowerWagon

4/14/2016 9:21:22 AM

#CASFanPic from @jmc.automotive. #Mazda #Racing

4/13/2016 4:33:20 PM

The day has come. #Ford #GT #Supercar

More

4/30/2016 3:31:34 PM

RT @ChiAutoShow: Look how far @Jeep has come since the '61 Chicago Auto Show! #FlashbackFriday https://t.co/wLP8yFK7VX

4/29/2016 1:33:32 PM

RT @ChiAutoShow: Look how far @Jeep has come since the '61 Chicago Auto Show! #FlashbackFriday https://t.co/wLP8yFK7VX

4/29/2016 9:27:15 AM

RT @ChiAutoShow: Look how far @Jeep has come since the '61 Chicago Auto Show! #FlashbackFriday https://t.co/wLP8yFK7VX

4/29/2016 8:29:01 AM

Look how far @Jeep has come since the '61 Chicago Auto Show! #FlashbackFriday https://t.co/wLP8yFK7VX

4/28/2016 1:23:05 PM

It takes HOW many @LEGO pieces to build this @Porsche 911 GT3 RS? https://t.co/vfT4ou1QnQ - via @CNET

4/27/2016 2:35:31 PM

RT @automobilemag: The hot new @Acura NSX looks even better in Chicago than it did in Detroit thanks to improved lighting. #CAS15 #NSX http…

4/26/2016 6:02:06 PM

RT @ChiAutoShow: . @drivechicago has launched its Twitter page! It's the only local source for more than 100,000 new & used cars. #DriveChi

4/26/2016 3:55:57 PM

RT @WWDr1ve: RT @ChiAutoShow: @drivechicago has launched its Twitter pg! It's the only local source for more than 100,000 new & used cars.…

4/26/2016 3:31:07 PM

RT @ChiAutoShow: @drivechicago has launched its Twitter pg! It's the only local source for more than 100,000 new & used cars. #DriveChicago

4/26/2016 11:07:23 AM

RT @ChiAutoShow: . @drivechicago has launched its Twitter page! It's the only local source for more than 100,000 new & used cars. #DriveChi